An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Solution for the Practical Application of Employee Turnover
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Employee turnover is a significant concern across industries, resulting in wasted training resources and the costs associated with hiring replacements. Understanding the under-lying reasons behind employee attrition is crucial for businesses seeking to address this issue. Employing data analytics solutions can lead to substantial savings in terms of training hours and financial resources. However, in addition to accurate predictions of employee turnover, the explainability of these analytics results is equally important to gain user trust. Many existing data analytics techniques provide predictions and recommendations in an opaque “black box” manner, making it challenging for humans to understand the reasoning behind them. In this paper, we present an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) solution that combines cutting-edge techniques and enhances them to generate practical and comprehensible explanations for end-users. To assess the effectiveness of our XAI solution, we conduct a case study using real-life employee turnover data. The results demonstrate the practicality and usefulness of our XAI solution in applications such as analyzing employee turnover.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".