MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403512153 · doi:10.33233/rbfex.v23i2.5601

III Simpósio Internacional de Fisiologia do Exercício e Saúde

2024· article· pt· W4403512153 on OpenAlexaff
Osvaldo Costa Moreira, Miguel Araujo Carneiro‐Júnior, Cláudia Eliza Patrocínio de Oliveira, João Carlos Bouzas Marins, Helton de Sá Souza, Anselmo Gomes de Moura, Bruno Gonzaga Teodoro, Camila Brandão, Cristiano Diniz da Silva, Danilo Reis Coimbra, Dihogo Gama de Matos, Édison Andrés Pérez Bedoya, Eliane A. Castro, Felipe J. Aidar, Francielle de Assis Arantes, Gabriela Rezende Venturini, Irismar Gonçalves Almeida da Encarnação, José Vítor Vieira Salgado, Lenice Kappes Becker, Lidiane Aparecida Fernandes, Lucas Vieira Santos, Lúcio Marques Vieira Souza, Filipe Moutinho, Matheus Santos Cerqueira, Mauro Lúcio Mazini Filho, Moacir Marocolo, Paulo Roberto dos Santos Amorim, Paula Janyn Melo Buitrago, Renata Aparecida Rodrigues de Oliveira, Samuel Encarnação, Sandro Fernandes da Silva, Suene Franciele Nunes Chaves, Victor Hugo Pereira Franco, Victor Neiva Lavorato

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Fisiologia do Exercício · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumos de trabalhos apresentados no III Simpósio Internacional de Fisiologia do Exercício e Saúde, 24 e 25 de maio de 2024, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Fisiologia do ExercícioSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207