MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403512568 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae144.188

P10.12.B DEEP LEARNING-BASED NORMALIZATION AND UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES FOR BRAIN TUMOR SURGERY

2024· article· en· W4403512568 on OpenAlexaff
David Black, J. Gill, Ashleigh Xie, Benoît Liquet, Antonio Di Ieva, Walter Stummer, Eric Suero Molina

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingNormalization (sociology)Artificial intelligenceSpatial normalizationComputer scienceDeep learningComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) for fluorescence-guided brain tumor resection enables better visualization of differences between tissues. This can maximize brain tumor resection, improving patient outcomes. However, much of the processing in HSI uses simplified models that are unable to capture the non-linear, wavelength-dependent phenomena that must be modeled for accurate recovery of fluorophore abundances. To overcome these challenges, measured spectra are normalized to account for artifacts and spectrally unmixed to isolate the protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) signal, which indicates malignant tissue. Existing methods are simplistic and based on phantoms and are unable to account for nonlinear effects such as multiple scattering or the inhomogeneous optical properties of the tissue. We propose a deep learning (DL)-based pipeline encompassing normalization and unmixing, which can fully account for the nonlinear effects and produce more accurate distributions of fluorophore abundances. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study proposes two deep learning models for correction and unmixing, which can capture these effects. Both models use autoencoder-like architectures. While one is trained with protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) concentration labels, the other is semi-supervised, learning hyperspectral unmixing self-supervised and then learning to correct the spectra for optical and geometric effects using a white-light reflectance spectrum in a few-shot manner. The models were evaluated on phantom and pig-brain data with known PpIX concentration. RESULTS The supervised and semi-supervised models achieved Pearson correlation coefficients (phantom, pig-brain) between known and computed PpIX concentrations of (0.997, 0.990) and (0.98, 0.91), respectively, whereas the classical approach achieved (0.93, 0.82). On human data, the semi-supervised model gives qualitatively more realistic results than the classical method, better reducing the variance in PpIX abundance over biopsies that should be relatively homogeneous. CONCLUSION These results show promise for using deep learning to improve HSI in fluorescence-guided neurosurgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207