MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A049: NKG2D and NKp30 activating receptors drive allogeneic natural killer cell responsiveness against pancreatic cancer

2024· article· en· W4403520007 on OpenAlexaff
Stacey N. Lee, Riley J. Arseneau, Jeanette E. Boudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNKG2DMedicineReceptorPancreatic cancerImmunotherapyImmunologyNatural killer cellCancerImmune systemCancer researchCytotoxic T cellBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Typified by late-stage diagnosis and treatment resistance, pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains refractory to immunotherapy. Natural Killer (NK) cells are mediators of cancer immunosurveillance and may have a unique ability to infiltrate and target PDAC. NK cell-mediated target cell recognition is dependent on the integration of heterogeneous signals from germline-encoded receptors for activation and inhibition. By identifying the role that ligand expression plays in contributing to NK cell driven-PDAC targeting, we expect to define key receptors involved in NK-PDAC interaction and inform precise NK-based PDAC immunotherapy.We hypothesize that ligands expressed by PDAC determine the subsets of NK cells that will respond to the tumor and that these constitute “inclusion” and “exclusion” criteria for effective NK cell-based immunotherapies. In a novel humanized mouse model which supports human NK cells through transgenic HLA and human IL-15, we demonstrate dose- dependent control of primary PDAC xenografts. Human NK cells and mouse leukocytes infiltrate NK-treated PDAC tumors in vivo leading to significant tumor burden reduction and lengthened survival. To explore receptor-ligand partnerships relevant in the outcome of NK:PDAC interactions, we probed the PDAC FIREHOSE 2016 dataset (TCGA) for relationships between tumor genomes and expression of ligands for NK cells. KRAS with or without TP53 mutated PDAC showed differential gene upregulation of NKG2D ligands, MICA and ULBP2, as well as TRAIL-R2 and TRAIL-R1. Using flow cytometry, we found that these ligands are indeed expressed (albeit to differing extents) on PDAC cell lines and are among the most prominent activating ligands available for NK cells. In response to inflammatory signals, these NKG2D ligands’ expression decreased and expression of inhibitory NK cell ligands including HLA I and PD-L1 increased. Functionally, these changes corresponded to decreased degranulation of NK cells cocultured with PDAC, suggesting a shift in the balance toward inhibitory signals, and underscoring a need to maximize activation of NK cells while minimizing their capacity for inhibitory signaling. To define the most potent signals for NK-PDAC interactions, we used a 27-colour flow cytometry panel that revealed the most responsive NK cells to be those that co-express NKG2D and NKp30. Blocking either of these receptors interrupted PDAC killing and blocking inhibitory KIR-HLA interactions enhanced killing. Ongoing studies imply that the combination of NK cells armed with these activating receptors but lacking inhibitory receptors for the HLA I expressed on tumors convey the best tumor protection in our in vivo model. These results indicate that selection of allogeneic NK cell donors can enable simultaneous removal of inhibitory signals and support of activating receptor engagement to maximize NK-PDAC interactions. Since this novel strategy does not require extensive selection, it leaves a polyfunctional NK cell population for comprehensive targeting of the diverse tumor cells that comprise PDAC tumors. Citation Format: Stacey N Lee, Riley J Arseneau, Jeanette E Boudreau. NKG2D and NKp30 activating receptors drive allogeneic natural killer cell responsiveness against pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2024 Oct 18-21; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2024;12(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A049.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207