Chordoma incidence, treatment, and survival in the 21st century: a population-based Ontario cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the incidence, treatment patterns, and overall survival for patients with chordoma treated in Ontario. METHODS: A 17-year (2003-2019) population-based cohort study was conducted, including all patients in the Ontario Cancer Registry with histologically proven chordoma. Primary outcomes of interest were age-standardized annual incidence, overall survival, and rates of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and open resection. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were diagnosed with chordoma over the study period: 97 patients with skull base chordoma, 37 with mobile spine chordoma, and 65 with sacropelvic chordoma. A total of 133 patients were treated with either open or endoscopic surgery, of whom 99 were also treated with some form of radiation therapy. Across the 17-year study period, the average annual age-standardized incidence was 12.04 cases per 10 million (95% CI 9.31-14.78 cases per 10 million). There was no significant change in the annual incidence rate over the study period (average annual percent change 2.27, 95% CI -1.74 to 6.44; p = 0.25). The odds of receiving radiation therapy or chemotherapy significantly increased by 8% per year (95% CI 1%-16% per year, p = 0.036) over the study period. The odds of receiving open resection significantly decreased by 14% per year (95% CI 8%-20% per year, p < 0.001). The odds of receiving endoscopic surgery among patients with skull base chordoma increased by 38% per year (95% CI 22%-60% per year, p < 0.001), while the odds of patients receiving biopsy alone did not change significantly over the study period (p = 0.684). After diagnosis of chordoma, the 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival probabilities were 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.81), 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.67), and 0.48 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.59), respectively. There was no significant association between hazard of death and year of diagnosis (p = 0.126) or anatomical location (p = 0.712, skull base vs mobile spine chordoma; p = 0.518 skull base vs sacropelvic chordoma). CONCLUSIONS: Chordoma is a rare disease with no significant change in the average annual incidence rate between 2003 to 2019. During this time, treatment with less invasive modalities increased, particularly for skull base chordoma. Overall survival exceeds 10 years for many patients, with no change in the hazard of death across the study period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".