MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403529600 · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.10.006

Additive manufacturing processing with ultra-short-pulse lasers

2024· article· en· W4403529600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Processes · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaserMaterials processingPulse (music)OptoelectronicsOpticsProcess engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology has garnered significant attention for its ability to fabricate three-dimensional (3D) products with complex geometries. While continuous wave (CW) lasers have traditionally been used in AM as heat sources, they face limitations in nano and micro-scale fabrication due to the diffusion of thermal energy, which results in heat-affected zones, residual stress, substrate degradation, poor dimensional accuracy, and surface finish issues. To address these challenges, ultra-short pulse lasers, such as femto- and pico-second lasers, have proven effective at micro- and nanometer scales. The ultra-short laser pulses inhibit thermally induced mechanisms, instead generating a dense photo-excited plasma that weakens lattice cohesion, introduces disorder, and increases the mobility of atoms and defects which leads to non-thermal melting, phase transformations, and mechanical effects like Coulomb explosion, along with polymerization via two-photon excitation. These phenomena enhance AM by reducing residual stress, limiting oxidation, minimizing substrate damage, and achieving high dimensional accuracy. Ultra-short pulse lasers have enabled advancements in laser-induced nano-joining, laser powder bed fusion, direct laser writing including laser-induced transfer (LIT), and laser-induced reduction processes (LIR), two-photon polymerization (2PP), marking significant progress in the fabrication of 3D and potentially 4D products. This study reviews ultrafast laser-matter interactions, nano-joining mechanisms, and large-scale sintering processes, highlighting recent developments in selective laser melting for lightweight alloys, refractory metals, and ceramics. Direct laser writing techniques, including 2PP, LIR, and LIT, are also discussed for their role in creating complex microdevices. The paper concludes with insights into future trends and potential advancements in ultra-short-pulsed laser-based AM, emphasizing its role in driving innovation such 4D fabrication and addressing limitations like temperature estimation in non-thermal region for further improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it