A Novel Fuzzy Image-Based UAV Landing Using RGBD Data and Visual SLAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, an innovative perception-guided approach is proposed for landing zone detection and realization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) operating in unstructured environments ridden with obstacles. To accommodate secure landing, two well-established tools, namely fuzzy systems and visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (vSLAM), are implemented into the landing pipeline. Firstly, colored images and point clouds acquired by a visual sensory device are processed to serve as characterizing maps that acquire information about flatness, steepness, inclination, and depth variation. By leveraging these images, a novel fuzzy map infers the areas for risk-free landing on which the UAV can safely land. Subsequently, the vSLAM system is employed to estimate the platform’s pose and an additional set of point clouds. The vSLAM point clouds presented in the corresponding keyframe are projected back onto the image plane on which a threshold fuzzy landing score map is applied. In other words, this binary image serves as a mask for the re-projected vSLAM world points to identify the best subset for landing. Once these image points are identified, their corresponding world points are located, and among them, the center of the cluster with the largest area is chosen as the point to land. Depending on the UAV’s size, four synthesis points are added to the vSLAM point cloud to execute the image-based visual servoing landing using image moment features. The effectiveness of the landing package is assessed through the ROS Gazebo simulation environment, where comparisons are made with a state-of-the-art landing site detection method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".