MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403542639 · doi:10.3390/mti8100092

Virtual Tasting in the Metaverse: Technological Advances and Consumer Behavior Impacts

2024· article· en· W4403542639 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMultimodal Technologies and Interaction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaverseWine tastingComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionFood scienceVirtual realityChemistryWine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Product tasting is a key element in improving customer satisfaction in the commercial environment. This study looks at the notion of traditional tasting and its effect on customer behavior and explores emerging tasting techniques, shedding light on the contribution of digital tasting. Indeed, the advent of the metaverse has made it possible to offer new virtual tasting experiences. However, this experience does not yet involve a sense of taste. Our manuscript highlights the potential of tasting in the metaverse through a descriptive study of various concrete cases of international brands that have included it in their marketing strategies. In light of the results, practical and theoretical recommendations are provided for professionals interested in leveraging virtual tools to improve consumer satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it