Сравнительный анализ состояния национальных банковских систем России и Канады в условиях макроэкономической нестабильности
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Цель статьи проведение сравнительного анализа состояния национальных экономик и банковских систем России и Канады на основе оценки в динамике за 20072018 гг. основных макроэкономических индикаторов (ВВП, инфляция, безработица, цены на нефть и др.), а также ключевых показателей развития банковского сектора (активы, собственный капитал, выданные кредиты, банковские депозиты и др.). The purpose of the research article is to conduct a comparative analysis of the condition of the national economies and banking systems of Russia and Canada on the basis of the assessment in dynamics for 20072018 of the main macroeconomic indicators (GDP, inflation, unemployment, oil prices, etc.), as well as key indicators of the development of the banking sector (assets, equity, loans, Bank deposits, etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.072 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it