From Simulations to Inference: Using Machine Learning to Tune Patient-Specific Finite-Element Models of the Middle Ear Towards Objective Diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational models, particularly finite-element (FE) models, are essential for interpreting experimental data and predicting system behavior, especially when direct measurements are limited. A major challenge in tuning these models is the large number of parameters involved. Traditional methods, such as one-by-one sensitivity analyses, are time-consuming, subjective, and often return only a single set of parameter values, focusing on reproducing averaged data rather than capturing the full variability of experimental measurements. In this study, we applied simulation-based inference (SBI) using neural posterior estimation (NPE) to tune an FE model of the human middle ear. The training dataset consisted of 10,000 FE simulations of stapes velocity, ear-canal (EC) input impedance, and absorbance, paired with seven FE parameter values randomly sampled within plausible ranges. The neural network learned the association between parameters and simulation outcomes, returning the probability distribution of parameter values that can reproduce experimental data. Our approach successfully identified parameter sets that reproduced three experimental datasets simultaneously. By accounting for experimental noise and variability during training, the method provided a probability distribution of parameters, representing all valid combinations that could fit the data, rather than tuning to averaged values. The network demonstrated robustness to noise and exhibited an efficient learning curve due to the large training dataset. SBI offers an objective alternative to laborious sensitivity analyses, providing probability distributions for each parameter and uncovering interactions between them. This method can be applied to any biological FE model, and we demonstrated its effectiveness using a middle-ear model. Importantly, it holds promise for objective differential diagnosis of conductive hearing loss by providing insight into the mechanical properties of the middle ear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".