MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403545397 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.15.618553

From Simulations to Inference: Using Machine Learning to Tune Patient-Specific Finite-Element Models of the Middle Ear Towards Objective Diagnosis

2024· preprint· en· W4403545397 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamid Motallebzadeh, Michael Deistler, Florian M. Schönleitner, Jakob H. Macke, Sunil Puria

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Sensitivity (control systems)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceNoise (video)Experimental dataInferenceProbability distributionFinite element methodMachine learningArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computational models, particularly finite-element (FE) models, are essential for interpreting experimental data and predicting system behavior, especially when direct measurements are limited. A major challenge in tuning these models is the large number of parameters involved. Traditional methods, such as one-by-one sensitivity analyses, are time-consuming, subjective, and often return only a single set of parameter values, focusing on reproducing averaged data rather than capturing the full variability of experimental measurements. In this study, we applied simulation-based inference (SBI) using neural posterior estimation (NPE) to tune an FE model of the human middle ear. The training dataset consisted of 10,000 FE simulations of stapes velocity, ear-canal (EC) input impedance, and absorbance, paired with seven FE parameter values randomly sampled within plausible ranges. The neural network learned the association between parameters and simulation outcomes, returning the probability distribution of parameter values that can reproduce experimental data. Our approach successfully identified parameter sets that reproduced three experimental datasets simultaneously. By accounting for experimental noise and variability during training, the method provided a probability distribution of parameters, representing all valid combinations that could fit the data, rather than tuning to averaged values. The network demonstrated robustness to noise and exhibited an efficient learning curve due to the large training dataset. SBI offers an objective alternative to laborious sensitivity analyses, providing probability distributions for each parameter and uncovering interactions between them. This method can be applied to any biological FE model, and we demonstrated its effectiveness using a middle-ear model. Importantly, it holds promise for objective differential diagnosis of conductive hearing loss by providing insight into the mechanical properties of the middle ear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207