MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403545679 · doi:10.7150/thno.100339

Aspects and prospects of preclinical theranostic radiopharmaceutical development

2024· review· en· W4403545679 on OpenAlex
Bryce J. B. Nelson, Viktoria Krol, Aditya Bansal, Jan Andersson, Frank Wuest, Mukesh Kumar Pandey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheranostics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsNorthern Alberta Institute of TechnologyAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreclinical researchNanotechnologyMedical physicsMedicineMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides an overview of preclinical theranostic radiopharmaceutical development, highlighting aspects of the preclinical development stages that can lead towards a clinical trial.The key stages of theranostic radiopharmaceutical development are outlined, including target selection, tracer development, radiopharmaceutical synthesis, automation and quality control, in vitro radiopharmaceutical analysis, selecting a suitable in vivo model, preclinical imaging and pharmacokinetic analysis, preclinical therapeutic analysis, dosimetry, toxicity, and preparing for clinical translation.Each stage is described and augmented with examples from the literature.Finally, an outlook on the prospects for the radiopharmaceutical theranostics field is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it