MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403565135 · doi:10.1093/ced/llae453

Acne-related quality of life and mental health among adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis

2024· article· en· W4403565135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's HealthUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJacobs FoundationFondation privée des Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève
KeywordsAcneMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Cross-sectional studyDistressPopulationMental healthDermatologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin conditions worldwide among adolescents. Beyond its physical manifestations, acne can leave invisible psychological scars. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the protective and risk factors of acne-related quality of life and its association with mental health outcomes. METHODS: The analysis included data collected in 2023 from adolescents enrolled in the SEROCoV-KIDS population-based cohort. By combining the Acne Severity and Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) scales, the following three groups were established: Acne-LowAQoL (adolescents with acne and low acne-related quality of life), Acne-HighAQoL and NoAcne-HighAQoL. We used multinomial and logistic regression to assess the association between health behaviours and mental health outcomes in these groups. RESULTS: Among 335 adolescents [mean age 16.1 years (SD 1.8), 56% female sex], 65 (19.4%) reported experiencing acne while maintaining a high Acne-QoL, 26 (7.7%) reported having acne and a low Acne-QoL, and 244 (72.9%) reported having nearly no acne. Low engagement in physical activity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.77], addictive use of social media (aOR 3.78, 95% CI 1.60-8.96), and prolonged screen time (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.26-7.08) were independently associated with Acne-LowAQoL. Conversely, those from the group, Acne-HighAQoL, reported higher social support (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.07-3.54). Adolescents with Acne-LowAQoL showed lower levels of self-esteem, resilience and increased psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Among adolescents with acne, physical activity and social support were positively associated with good acne-related quality of life, which translated into better mental health. In contrast, screen time and social media use notably worsened mental health. Dermatologists should incorporate these considerations into clinical practice to ensure effective patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it