MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403565706 · doi:10.21275/sr24724150350

Real-Time Content Moderation Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

2021· article· en· W4403565706 on OpenAlexaff
Arjun Mantri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Canadian institutionsMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerationContent (measure theory)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the digital age, the volume of user-generated content on online platforms has skyrocketed, making real-time content moderation a critical task. This paper explores the application of AI and machine learning (ML) in automating content moderation, highlighting techniques such as Natural Language Processing (NLP), computer vision, audio analysis, and behavioral analysis. These technologies enable platforms to detect and remove inappropriate content swiftly and efficiently, ensuring safe and respectful online environments. Challenges and ethical considerations, including false positives and negatives, bias in AI models, transparency, and privacy concerns, are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Same topicHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionFrench-language works237,207