MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403572948 · doi:10.14740/jh1343

Siltuximab in Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease: Real-World Experience

2024· article· en· W4403572948 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ciprian Jitaru, Argiris Symeonidis, Sorina Bădeliță, Eirini Katodritou, Andrei Coliţă, A. Mpanti, Anamaria Bancos, Adrian Bogdan Țigu, Petra Rotariu, Laura Urian, Ioana Rus, Delia Dima, Anca Bojan, Marc Damian, Vasiliki Labropoulou, Mihai-Stefan Muresan, Despina Fotiou, Bogdan Fetică, Bobe Petrushev, Angela Dǎscǎlescu, Dimitra Dalampira, Sanda Buruiana, Cătălin Constantinescu, Mihnea Zdrenghea, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Evangelos Terpos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRecordati Rare Diseases
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseCastleman diseasePathologyDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Castleman disease (CD) is a very rare, non-malignant lymphoproliferative disorder that can be classified as unicentric or multicentric (MCD). MCD is associated with systemic symptoms, including organ dysfunction due to cytokine dysregulation, primarily interleukin-6 (IL-6). The anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab is recommended as a frontline treatment for idiopathic MCD (iMCD), but real-world data on its use in routine clinical practice are limited. This study aimed to assess disease response and survival outcomes in patients with iMCD treated with siltuximab therapy in real-world settings in Greece and Romania. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with iMCD treated with siltuximab in clinical practice across Greece and Romania between January 2017 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was overall response rate and secondary endpoints included survival and safety outcomes. Response assessments were performed according to the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network guidelines. Patients were followed until death, loss to follow-up or study conclusion (October 2023). Results: Forty-eight patients with iMCD were included in the study. Mean age at baseline was 65 years, with significant age differences between patients from Greece (74 years) and Romania (54 years). The majority of patients were male (68.8%) and received one prior line of therapy (75%). Patients included in the study received a median of nine cycles of siltuximab. Response data were available for 38 patients. The overall response to siltuximab was 71.1%, with 55.3% of patients achieving a complete response, and 15.8% a partial response. The estimated overall survival rate at 3 years was 74% and the median survival was 123 months. The most common adverse events (> 5%) included elevated liver enzymes, anxiety, allergic reactions and nausea/diarrhea. Serious adverse events were experienced by 16.7% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that siltuximab-based therapy is effective in treating iMCD in real-world settings in Greece and Romania. To our knowledge, this study represents the largest real-world analysis of siltuximab in European patients with iMCD so far.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207