Determination of Load Forces on the Upper Part of Orthopedic and Postoperative Shoes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determined patterns of force load on the sole and upper of orthopedic and postoperative shoes when bending the foot while walking. To determine the force of the load on the top of the postoperative orthopedic shoes, the frictional forces between the lateral surfaces of the shoes and the outer lateral sides of the foot can be neglected. Thus, the task will be reduced to the compilation of equilibrium equations of a plane system of forces. As can be seen from the load diagram of the top of the shoe, we have a flat arbitrarily located system of forces. To determine the unknown forces, it is necessary to compile a system of two equilibrium equations, which will represent the algebraic sums of the projections of all forces on the horizontal and vertical axes. To automate the design process of orthopedic and postoperative shoes, a computer program was developed that allows you to perform calculations of the corresponding forces and tension depending on the design and types of material of individual elements, as well as obtain regression equations for determining the effect of tension on the magnitude of the detachment force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".