Determination of Load Forces on the Upper Part of Orthopedic and Postoperative Shoes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determined patterns of force load on the sole and upper of orthopedic and postoperative shoes when bending the foot while walking. To determine the force of the load on the top of the postoperative orthopedic shoes, the frictional forces between the lateral surfaces of the shoes and the outer lateral sides of the foot can be neglected. Thus, the task will be reduced to the compilation of equilibrium equations of a plane system of forces. As can be seen from the load diagram of the top of the shoe, we have a flat arbitrarily located system of forces. To determine the unknown forces, it is necessary to compile a system of two equilibrium equations, which will represent the algebraic sums of the projections of all forces on the horizontal and vertical axes. To automate the design process of orthopedic and postoperative shoes, a computer program was developed that allows you to perform calculations of the corresponding forces and tension depending on the design and types of material of individual elements, as well as obtain regression equations for determining the effect of tension on the magnitude of the detachment force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".