MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403586871 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53261-x

120 GOPS Photonic tensor core in thin-film lithium niobate for inference and in situ training

2024· article· en· W4403586871 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhongjin Lin, Bhavin J. Shastri, Shangxuan Yu, Jingxiang Song, Yuntao Zhu, Arman Safarnejadian, Wangning Cai, Yanmei Lin, Wei Ke, Mustafa Hammood, Tianye Wang, Mengyue Xu, Zibo Zheng, Mohammed Al-Qadasi, Omid Esmaeeli, Mohamed Rahim, Grzegorz Pakulski, Jens H. Schmid, Pedro Barrios, Weihong Jiang, Hugh Morison, Matthew Mitchell, Xun Guan, Nicolas A. F. Jaeger, Leslie A. Rusch, Sudip Shekhar, Wei Shi, Siyuan Yu, Xinlun Cai, Lukas Chrostowski

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversité LavalQueen's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringPhotonicsComputer scienceLithium niobateComputer architectureArtificial neural networkTensor (intrinsic definition)Artificial intelligenceMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonics offers a transformative approach to artificial intelligence (AI) and neuromorphic computing by enabling low-latency, high-speed, and energy-efficient computations. However, conventional photonic tensor cores face significant challenges in constructing large-scale photonic neuromorphic networks. Here, we propose a fully integrated photonic tensor core, consisting of only two thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) modulators, a III-V laser, and a charge-integration photoreceiver. Despite its simple architecture, it is capable of implementing an entire layer of a neural network with a computational speed of 120 GOPS, while also allowing flexible adjustment of the number of inputs (fan-in) and outputs (fan-out). Our tensor core supports rapid in-situ training with a weight update speed of 60 GHz. Furthermore, it successfully classifies (supervised learning) and clusters (unsupervised learning) 112 × 112-pixel images through in-situ training. To enable in-situ training for clustering AI tasks, we offer a solution for performing multiplications between two negative numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207