MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403592692 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.17.618958

<i>In vivo</i> Protective Efficacy of Emodin in Swiss Albino Mice Induced with Dalton Ascitic Lymphoma

2024· preprint· en· W4403592692 on OpenAlexaff
Jagadish Kumar Suluvoy, Harish Babu Kolla, Aavany Balasubramanian

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmodinIn vivoLymphomaPharmacologyCancer researchChemistryMedicineInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistryBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lymphoma is a tumor that affects lymphoid tissues in the body. Treating lymphoma has become challenging because of the complexity of disease pathology, drug resistance mechanisms and side effects of existing chemo and radiation therapies. Treating cancers/tumors with plant based natural compounds is gaining interest recently because of their less toxicity profiles and efficiency in controlling the disease severity. Emodin is one such compound with such anti-cancer/tumor properties. It has immunosuppressive and anti-cancer properties through multiple ways. In this study, we have studied the therapeutic effect of emodin molecule in the DAL induced lymphoma, a well-established murine model to study and test the anti-lymphoma drugs. Our data has shown an outstanding therapeutic effect of emodin in controlling the lymphoma readouts in DAL induce Swiss Albino mice. These effects were studied in comparison with a standard drug molecule called methotrexate. Furthermore, the in-silico analysis has shown that emodin as a potential drug candidate for lymphoma based on the Lipinski’s rule of 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPhytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plantsFrench-language works237,207