MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403598144 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011447

HTL/KAI2 signaling substitutes for light to control plant germination

2024· article· en· W4403598144 on OpenAlexafffund
Jenna E. Hountalas, Michael Bunsick, Zhenhua Xu, Andrea A. Taylor, Gianni Pescetto, George Ly, François‐Didier Boyer, Christopher S. P. McErlean, Shelley Lumba

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArizona Biomedical Research Commission
KeywordsBiologyGerminationPhytochromeArabidopsisArabidopsis thalianaBotanyCell biologyStrigolactoneGibberellinSignal transductionPlant hormoneBiochemistryGeneRed light

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants monitor multiple environmental cues, such as light and temperature, to ensure they germinate at the right time and place. Some specialist plants, like ephemeral fire-following weeds and root parasitic plants, germinate primarily in response to small molecules found in specific environments. Although these species come from distinct clades, they use the same HYPOSENSITIVE TO LIGHT/KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (HTL/KAI2) signaling pathway, to perceive different small molecules suggesting convergent evolution on this pathway. Here, we show that HTL/KAI2 signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana bypasses the light requirement for germination. The HTL/KAI2 downstream component, SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1 (SMAX1) accumulates in the dark and is necessary for PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 1/PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 3-LIKE 5 (PIF1/PIL5) to regulate hormone response pathways conducive to germination. The interaction of HTL/KAI2 and light signaling may help to explain how specialist plants like ephemeral and parasitic weeds evolved their germination behaviour in response to specific environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS GeneticsSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207