MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403599151 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.2024.12

The Orange windigo: Thomas Scott in the twenty-first century

2024· article· en· W4403599151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Albert Braz

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrange (colour)HistoryEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ontario Orangeman Thomas Scott has long been known as one of the most ignoble figures in Canadian history, being widely considered the epitome of chauvinism and xenophobia. Scott owes his notoriety almost entirely to getting himself killed by Louis Riel’s Métis-dominated provisional government at Red River in 1870, but his misfortune has not garnered him much sympathy. On the contrary, his reputation was so soiled after the Second World War that it became permissible to level the vilest allegations against Scott, even that he was a vicious killer. However, there has been a critical change in the narrative since then, with some writers and scholars suggesting that it was not Scott but Riel who was most responsible for the devastating consequences of the Orangeman’s killing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207