AMRColab – a user-friendly antimicrobial resistance detection and visualization tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to global public health, with the potential to cause millions of deaths annually by 2050. Effective surveillance of AMR pathogens is crucial for monitoring and predicting their behaviour in response to antibiotics. However, many public health professionals lack the necessary bioinformatics skills and resources to analyse pathogen genomes effectively. To address this challenge, we developed AMRColab, an open-access bioinformatics analysis suite hosted on Google Colaboratory. AMRColab enables users with limited or no bioinformatics training to detect and visualize AMR determinants in pathogen genomes using a ‘plug-and-play’ approach. The platform integrates established bioinformatics tools such as AMRFinderPlus and hAMRonization, allowing users to analyse, compare and visualize trends in AMR pathogens easily. A trial run using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains demonstrated AMRColab’s effectiveness in identifying AMR determinants and facilitating comparative analysis across strains. A workshop was conducted and feedback from participants indicated high confidence in using AMRColab and a willingness to incorporate it into their research. AMRColab’s user-friendly interface and modular design make it accessible to a diverse audience, including medical laboratory technologists, medical doctors and public health scientists, regardless of their bioinformatics expertise. Future improvements to AMRColab will include enhanced visualization tools, multilingual support and the establishment of an online community platform. AMRColab represents a significant step towards democratizing AMR surveillance and empowering public health professionals to combat AMR effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".