Order-2 Probabilistic Information Fusion on Random Permutation Set
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a multi-object recognition scenario is considered to extend the random finite set into random permutation set. Probabilistic information on random permutation set can be viewed as an distribution determined by three random variables. We use another emerging uncertainty representation, order-2 information granule, to realize the probabilistic information fusion on random permutation sets. First, the probabilistic information on random permutation sets is viewed as an order-2 probability distribution. Second, corresponding information fusion approach is proposed. Finally, the proposed approach is applied to random permutation sets, resolving the decision-making issue under the multi-object recognition scenario. This paper pioneers the connection of order-2 information processing logic to a multi-object recognition task and develops order-2 probability distribution and its combination rules. Compared to the traditional probabilistic information fusion approaches, the proposed approach takes into account not only the propositions’ beliefs provided by the sources, but the structural dependency among propositions as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it