Engineering <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> for the Production of Punicic Acid-Rich Yeast Biomass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Punicic acid (PuA), an unusual conjugated linolenic acid found in pomegranate, offers diverse health benefits and has potential applications in the food industry. Due to the limited availability of PuA from natural plant sources, there is growing interest in producing it through microbial fermentation. In this study, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is classified as “generally recognized as safe”, was engineered to produce PuA using a results-driven approach. Genes potentially involved in PuA synthesis were integrated directly into the yeast genome, targeting Ty retrotransposon sites. Screening of the yeast transformants, followed by optimization of culture conditions, resulted in the production of 26.7% PuA within the yeast’s total fatty acids. Further analysis revealed that the strain’s triacylglycerol fraction contained over 22% PuA. By incorporating this health-promoting lipid into the nutritional profile of S. cerevisiae, the engineered strain could serve as a sustainable source of yeast biomass with enhanced nutritional value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".