A two-task predictor for discovering phase separation proteins and their undergoing mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is one of the mechanisms mediating the compartmentalization of macromolecules (proteins and nucleic acids) in cells, forming biomolecular condensates or membraneless organelles. Consequently, the systematic identification of potential LLPS proteins is crucial for understanding the phase separation process and its biological mechanisms. A two-task predictor, Opt_PredLLPS, was developed to discover potential phase separation proteins and further evaluate their mechanism. The first task model of Opt_PredLLPS combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) through a fully connected layer, where the CNN utilizes evolutionary information features as input, and BiLSTM utilizes multimodal features as input. If a protein is predicted to be an LLPS protein, it is input into the second task model to predict whether this protein needs to interact with its partners to undergo LLPS. The second task model employs the XGBoost classification algorithm and 37 physicochemical properties following a three-step feature selection. The effectiveness of the model was validated on multiple benchmark datasets, and in silico saturation mutagenesis was used to identify regions that play a key role in phase separation. These findings may assist future research on the LLPS mechanism and the discovery of potential phase separation proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".