MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403612449 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53127-2

Calorie restriction increases insulin sensitivity to promote beta cell homeostasis and longevity in mice

2024· article· en· W4403612449 on OpenAlexafffund
Cristiane dos Santos, Amanda Cambraia, Shristi Shrestha, Melanie Cutler, Matthew A. Cottam, Guy Perkins, Varda Lev‐Ram, Birbickram Roy, Christopher Acree, Keunyoung Kim, Thomas J. Deerinck, E. Danielle Dean, Jean‐Philippe Cartailler, Patrick E. MacDonald, Martin W. Hetzer, Mark H. Ellisman, Rafael Arrojo e Drigo

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthVanderbilt UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsHomeostasisGlucose homeostasisCell biologyMitophagyBeta cellLongevityEnergy homeostasisBiologyMitochondrionBETA (programming language)CellTranscriptomeCalorie restrictionNRF1Cell growthTranscription factorAutophagyInsulinMitochondrial biogenesisGene expressionEndocrinologyInsulin resistanceGeneBiochemistryGeneticsIsletApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caloric restriction (CR) can extend the organism life- and health-span by improving glucose homeostasis. How CR affects the structure-function of pancreatic beta cells remains unknown. We used single nucleus transcriptomics to show that CR increases the expression of genes for beta cell identity, protein processing, and organelle homeostasis. Gene regulatory network analysis reveal that CR activates transcription factors important for beta cell identity and homeostasis, while imaging metabolomics demonstrates that beta cells upon CR are more energetically competent. In fact, high-resolution microscopy show that CR reduces beta cell mitophagy to increase mitochondria mass and the potential for ATP generation. However, CR beta cells have impaired adaptive proliferation in response to high fat diet feeding. Finally, we show that long-term CR delays the onset of beta cell aging hallmarks and promotes cell longevity by reducing beta cell turnover. Therefore, CR could be a feasible approach to preserve compromised beta cell structure-function during aging and diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207