MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403613301 · doi:10.1177/08830738241283171

Stress and Quality of Life of Parents of Children With POLR3-Related Leukodystrophy: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study

2024· article· en· W4403613301 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Lentini, Helia Toutounchi, Alexandra Chapleau, Adam Le, Simon Fournier, Fatemeh Emari, Robert Flamini, Andrea Rossi, Ángela Gentile, Enrico Bertini, Francesco Nicita, Daniela Pohl, Sunita Venkateswaran, Stephanie Keller, Elsa Rossignol, Deborah L. Renaud, Danilo de Assis Pereira, Xiaoru Chen, Adeline Vanderver, Geneviève Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Child Neurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeChildren's Hospital FoundationFondation de l'Hôpital de Montréal pour enfantsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health CentreNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFondation du Grand défi Pierre LavoieMinistero della SaluteMcGill University
KeywordsQuality of life (healthcare)MedicineLeukodystrophyCross-sectional studyPopulationClinical psychologyDiseasePsychologyPediatricsGerontologyInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: RNA polymerase III (POLR3)-related leukodystrophy is a rare, neurodegenerative disorder characterized by hypomyelination, hypodontia, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Despite the challenges of caring for a child with POLR3-related leukodystrophy, few studies have examined parents’ disease burden. We sought to investigate quality of life and stress levels amongst parents of children with POLR3-related leukodystrophy. Methods: 43 parents of 32 children completed questionnaires on demographics, stress, quality of life, coping mechanisms, and experience of injustice. Detailed clinical data was collected from all patients. Results: Mothers ( t[27] = –8.66, P < .001) and fathers (t[16] = –4.47, P < .001) had lower quality of life scores compared to the normative population, yet 80% of parents’ stress scores fell within the normal stress range. Parents’ experience of injustice scores were high (>60). Correlations were found between and within parents’ scores. Years since disease onset and certain life circumstances correlated to mothers’ quality of life scores; however, no correlation was found between modifiable factors and fathers’ quality of life scores. Helpful coping mechanisms included those that allowed parents to be involved in their child's life. Conclusions: This is the first study to assess stress and quality of life in this population. These results shed light on the importance of implementing services and social support to improve the well-being of parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Child NeurologySame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207