MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403622663 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.02812

On Continuous Terminal Embeddings of Sets of Positive Reach

2024· preprint· en· W4403622663 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Simone Brugiapaglia, Rafael Chiclana, Tim Hoheisel, Mark Iwen

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre de Recherches MathématiquesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)MathematicsComputer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we prove the existence of Hölder continuous terminal embeddings of any desired $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ into $\mathbb{R}^{m}$ with $m=\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-2}ω(S_X)^2)$, for arbitrarily small distortion $\varepsilon$, where $ω(S_X)$ denotes the Gaussian width of the unit secants of $X$. More specifically, when $X$ is a finite set we provide terminal embeddings that are locally $\frac{1}{2}$-Hölder almost everywhere, and when $X$ is infinite with positive reach we give terminal embeddings that are locally $\frac{1}{4}$-Hölder everywhere sufficiently close to $X$ (i.e., within all tubes around $X$ of radius less than $X$'s reach). When $X$ is a compact $d$-dimensional submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^N$, an application of our main results provides terminal embeddings into $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d)$-dimensional space that are locally Hölder everywhere sufficiently close to the manifold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicOptimization and Variational AnalysisFrench-language works237,207