Bi-Level Transfer Learning for Lifelong-Intelligent Energy Management of Electric Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automotive energy management systems (EMS) are advancing towards comprehensive lifecycle-intelligence, spanning from product development phase to customer usage phase. This paper proposes a bi-level transfer approach with model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) to realize cross-platform transferable and online-adaptive EMS. During the development level, MAML is adopted to calibrate the heuristic control maps of an instantaneous optimization-based EMS, with a per-unit state and action space design facilitating knowledge transfer. Leveraging user data, online adaptation is carried out with reliance on digital twin-based cloud computing, updating onboard controller parameters. The effectiveness of the proposed lifecycle intelligent EMS is validated through real vehicle experiments. Firstly, the entire MAML-assisted V-cycle development process is finished to validate the optimality and knowledge transfer of the EMS, resulting in zero-shot transfer for EMS calibration on new vehicle products. Additionally, real vehicle experimental tests show that a correction of 8.0%~9.5% fuel economy is improved against the convention reinforcement learning-based EMS during usage via online-adaptation, effectively bridging the optimality gap between the control policy learned in development and the global optimal control in actual driving scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".