Identification of key signaling pathways and novel computational drug target for oral cancer, metabolic disorders and periodontal disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Due to conventional endocrinological methods, there is presently no shared work available, and no therapeutic options have been demonstrated in oral cancer (OC) and periodontal disease (PD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and obese patients. The aim of this study is to determine the similar molecular pathways and potential therapeutic targets in PD, OC, T2D, and obesity that may be used to anticipate the progression of the disease. METHODS: Four Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) microarray datasets (GSE29221, GSE15773, GSE16134, and GSE13601) are used for finding differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for T2D, obese, and PD patients with OC in order to explore comparable pathways and therapeutic medications. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis were used to investigate the functional annotations of the genes. The hub genes were then identified using protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, and the most significant PPI components were evaluated using a clustering approach. RESULTS: These three gene expression-based datasets yielded a total of seven common DEGs. According to the GO annotation, the majority of the DEGs were connected with the microtubule cytoskeleton structure involved in mitosis. The KEGG pathways revealed that the concordant DEGs are connected to the cell cycle and progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation. Based on topological analysis of the PPI network, major hub genes (CCNB1, BUB1, TTK, PLAT, and AHNAK) and notable modules were revealed. This work additionally identified the connection of TF genes and miRNAs with common DEGs, as well as TF activity. CONCLUSION: Predictive drug analysis yielded concordant drug compounds involved with T2D, OC, PD, and obesity disorder, which might be beneficial for examining the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of metabolic disorders and Oral cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".