MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403632419 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.19.619231

Ultrastructural viscoelastic behavior of fibrillar collagen identified by AFM Nano-Rheometry and direct indentation

2024· preprint· en· W4403632419 on OpenAlexaff
Meisam Asgari, Elahe Mirzarazi Dahagi, Robert D. Frisina, Hojatollah Vali, Horacio D. Espinosa

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCollagen: Extraction and Characterization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscoelasticityAtomic force microscopyUltrastructureMaterials scienceNano-NanotechnologyBiophysicsComposite materialPathologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soft tissues exhibit predominantly time-dependent mechanical behavior critical for their biological function in organs like the lungs and aorta, as they can deform and stretch at varying rates depending on their function. Collagen type I serves as the primary structural component in these tissues. The viscoelastic characteristics of such tissues, stemming from diverse energy dissipation mechanisms across various length scales, remains poorly characterized at the nanoscale. Prior experimental investigations have predominantly centered on analyzing tissue responses largely attributed to interactions between cells and fibers. Despite many studies on tissue viscoelasticity from scaffolds to single collagen fibrils, the time-dependent mechanics of collagen fibrils at the sub-fibrillar level remain poorly understood. This pioneering study employs atomic force microscopy (AFM) nano-rheometry and indentation testing to examine the viscoelastic characteristics of individual collagen type I fibrils at the ultrastructural level within distinct topographical zones, specifically focusing on gap and overlap regions. Our investigation has unveiled that collagen fibrils display a viscoelastic response that replicates the mechanical behavior of the tissue at the macroscale. Further, our findings suggest a distinct viscoelastic behavior between the gap and overlap regions, likely stemming from variances in molecular organization and cross-linking modalities within these specific sites. The results of our investigation provide unequivocal proof of the temporal dependence of mechanical properties and provides unique data to be compared to atomistic models, laying a foundation for refining the precision of macroscale models that strive to capture tissue viscoelasticity across varying length scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207