MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Umlaut in Germanic Languages

2024· book-chapter· en· W4403633547 on OpenAlexaff
Gunnar Ólafur Hansson, Richard Wiese

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanic languagesLinguisticsComputer scienceHistoryPhilosophyGerman

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter focuses on i-umlaut in German (involving vowel fronting) and Icelandic (involving fronting and unrounding), and on u-umlaut in Icelandic (involving rounding and fronting of the vowel /a/). ‘Umlaut’ refers to a variety of word-internal vowel alternations found in Germanic languages, which are the present-day reflexes of regressive assimilation induced by suffix vowels of certain kinds. I-umlaut in present-day Standard German is discussed as a partially productive, partially unproductive historical remnant of a word-final high front vowel. In contrast, u-umlaut in Icelandic is a far more productive phenomenon, although the common view that it still involves a synchronically active phonological assimilation process is shown to be problematic. In both languages, umlaut is triggered by derivational and inflectional morphology alike. Various approaches to the interpretation of umlaut in recent theoretical literature are discussed as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooks→Same topicPhonetics and Phonology Research→French-language works237,207→