MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403634834 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39710

Regional primary preadipocyte characteristics in humans with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus

2024· review· en· W4403634834 on OpenAlexafffund
Claire Plissonneau, Sylvia Santosa

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConcordia University
KeywordsObesityType 2 Diabetes MellitusDiabetes mellitusMedicineInternal medicineType 2 diabetesEndocrinologyGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The excessive accumulation of adipose tissue in obesity appears to result in adipose tissue dysfunction perpetuating the onset of obesity-related diseases, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In humans, adipose tissue is stored in several depots including subcutaneous and visceral. These depots contribute to the pathology of obesity differently owing to differences in the tissue microenvironment, a main one being preadipocyte function. In examining adipocyte and preadipocyte characteristics, many have used the 3T3-L1 murine cell lines. Though these cell lines provide valuable mechanistic data, the results remain to be translated to humans. Experiments using primary human preadipocytes has shown that obesity and T2DM impact preadipocyte phenotypes. The objective of this review is to describe the differences in regional characteristics of primary preadipocytes collected from humans with obesity and to discuss how these characteristics might be affected in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In doing so, we will show that the characteristics of regional primary preadipocytes in humans are differentially affected by obesity and the development of T2DM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesFrench-language works237,207