MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403635956 · doi:10.1109/tie.2024.3472216

Ultrafast Transient Response in 48 V Automotive VRMs: An Auxiliary-Assisted Adaptive Slew-Rate Control Scheme

2024· article· en· W4403635956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNXP Semiconductors
KeywordsSlew rateControl theory (sociology)Transient responseTransient (computer programming)Ultrashort pulseAutomotive industryAdaptive controlComputer scienceEngineeringVoltagePhysicsControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an auxiliary-assisted hybrid dc–dc converter for 48 V automotive voltage regulator modules (VRMs) that enable adaptive inductor-current slew-rate control for ultrafast transient response. The main stage, a 4:1 dual-inductor hybrid (DIH) dc–dc converter, delivers the dc load power, while the output voltage is regulated by a GaN-based auxiliary-buck stage that is ac-coupled by a buffer capacitor. The main stage regulates the output of the ac-coupled auxiliary stage using an average-current-mode-control (ACMC) scheme to achieve adaptive control of the auxiliary-inductor-current slew rate. The auxiliary ac-coupled buck (ACB) converter regulates the output voltage based on an output-capacitor current-based hysteretic-current-mode-control (HCMC) scheme. An adaptive-voltage-positioning (AVP) scheme is proposed for the auxiliary capacitor, which preemptively positions the ACB output voltage for improved transient response. A small-signal model of the auxiliary-assisted converter is presented for stability analysis and validated with simulation results. A 40 W proof-of-concept prototype was fabricated to demonstrate the feasibility of the adaptive slew-rate control technique and AVP scheme. The prototype achieves a peak efficiency of 90.6% with an output capacitance of 500 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{\mathbf{\mu}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>F and an auxiliary capacitance of 22 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{\mathbf{\mu}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>F, while maintaining the output voltage deviation within 50 mV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it