Bibliographic record
Abstract
La suite de romans de Monénembo constituée de Peuls (2004), Le roi de Kahel (2008), Le terroriste noir (2012), peut être lue comme la volonté de l’auteur de rappeler la place de sa communauté (les Peuls de l’Afrique de l’Ouest) dans l’histoire mondiale. Le premier roman constitue le socle qui explique les fondements de la culture peule ; le deuxième propose, au-delà des récits mythiques ou populaires, une reconstruction des faits historiques relatifs à la conquête du Fouta Djalon, le terroir peul de la Guinée natale de l’auteur ; le troisième réhabilite un personnage peul oublié de l’histoire coloniale et de la littérature scientifique, Addi Bâ, figure de la Résistance française. De l’un à l’autre, s’affirme une circularité de ce qui fait l’homo fulanus. Thématiquement liés, ils racontent les événements historiques marquants et les aventures d’un peuple qui a traversé le temps et son lot de violences. Ils sont saga, affirmation d’une identité collective et témoignage d’une « capacité de résilience africaine ». Cet article propose donc, dans une perspective transdisciplinaire, une lecture monographique du roman historique chez Monénembo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".