Multi-year comparison of VITEK MS performance for identification of rarely encountered pathogenic Gram-negative organisms (GNOs) in a large integrated Canadian healthcare region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This multi-year study (2014–2019) compared identification of rare and unusual Gram-negative organisms (GNOs) by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (VITEK MS, bioMérieux, Laval Que.) to 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S) according to our laboratories routine workflow; 16S is done if initial MALDI-TOF MS gave discordant, wrong, or no results. GNB isolates were first analyzed by standard phenotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS using direct deposit-full formic acid extraction; proteomics was repeated if no result occurred. Medically approved 16S analyses were done using fast protocols. Isolate sequences were analyzed using the Integrated Database Network System (IDNS3) bacterial database (SmartGene, Lausanne, Switzerland). Three hundred thirty-one GNOs including 251 (76%) aerobic Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), 63 (19%) fastidious Gram-negative coccobacilli (fGNCBs), and 17 (5%) Campylobacterales (CAMPB) isolates were recovered from 304 specimens; >1 isolate was recovered from 19 (6%). GNOs were mainly recovered from blood cultures (31.6%) and lower respiratory specimens (43%) (one-half were isolated from cystic fibrosis patients). Accurate genus vs species identities were obtained for 67.7% and 32.5% aerobic GNBs, 73% and 60% fGNCBs, and 23.5% CAMPB (with no discrepant species), respectively. Wrong or no results were obtained for 81 (32.3%) aerobic GNBs, 17 (27%) fGNCBs, and 13 (72.2%) CAMPB. No results or misidentifications occurred for 33% of aerobic GNBs, 26% of fGNCBs, and 76.5% of CAMPB due to absence of species in the instrument’s database. VITEK MS performance remained stable for aerobic GNBs and fGNCBs but improved for CAMPB with addition of Campylobacter rectus and Campylobacter curvus to the database. 16S remains important for identification of GNOs when proteomics fails. IMPORTANCE Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has transformed the identification of commonly encountered Gram-negative organisms (GNOs) in the clinical laboratory, but rare and unusual organisms continue to challenge the technology. This study verified performance of VITEK MS for identification of a broad range of rare and unusual clinical GNO isolates by our large reference laboratory workflow over a multi-year period. Although most GNOs were accurately identified by MALDI-TOF MS, a small number of clinical isolates (~1%–6%) required 16S sequencing for identification depending on the GNO category. Approximately one-third of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli (GNBs) and two-thirds of Campylobacterales could not be accurately identified by proteomics due to lack of an organism in the instrument’s database. MALDI-TOF MS databases should be continuously updated and validated, and laboratories should have a workflow for identification of unusual or rarely encountered aerobic, fastidious, and Campylobacterales GNOs that includes 16S rRNA gene sequencing whenever proteomics cannot give a definitive identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".