<i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> infection induces the expression of the chemokine CXCL16 in macrophages to promote chemoattraction of CXCR6 <sup>+</sup> cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT CXCL16 is a multifaceted chemokine expressed by macrophages and other immune cells in response to viral and bacterial pathogens. However, few studies have investigated its role in parasitic infections. The obligate intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii ( T. gondii ) is the causative agent of toxoplasmosis, an infection with potentially deleterious consequences in immunocompromised individuals and the developing fetus of acutely infected pregnant women. Chemokines are critical mediators of host defense and, as such, dysregulation of their expression is a subversion strategy often employed by the parasite to ensure its survival. Herein, we report that types I and II T. gondii strains upregulated the expression of both transmembrane and soluble forms of CXCL16 in infected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM). Exposure to soluble T. gondii antigens (STAg) and to excreted–secreted proteins (TgESP) led to the induction of CXCL16. Cxcl16 mRNA abundance and CXCL16 protein levels increased in a time-dependent manner upon T. gondii infection. Importantly, conditioned medium (CM) collected from T. gondii -infected wild-type (WT) macrophage cultures promoted the migration of RAW264.7 cells expressing CXCR6, the cognate receptor of CXCL16, an effect that was significantly reduced by a neutralizing anti-CXCL16 antibody or use of CM from CXCL16 knockout (KO) macrophages. Lastly, T. gondii -driven CXCL16 expression appeared to modulate cytokine-induced (IL-4 + IL-13) alternative macrophage activation and M2 phenotypic marker expression. Further investigation is required to determine whether this chemokine contributes to the pathogenesis of toxoplasmosis and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".