Mallomonas gigantica sp. nov., an Eocene synurophyte possessing the largest known siliceous scales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new fossil species representing the genus Mallomonas, M. gigantica, is described from the Giraffe Pipe Eocene maar lake locality situated near the Arctic Circle in northern Canada. The new species possesses rolled bristles and two basic types of scales that lack V-ribs, body scales and specialized apical scales. Mallomonas gigantica possesses the largest body scales reported for the genus, including for both fossil and contemporary taxa. Scales reached 12 µm in length and with a surface area near 100 µm2. Body scales are large, square-shaped, with a narrow posterior rim, large and thick anterior submarginal ribs, and a shallow dome with a curved margin that aids in securing the bristle. Base plate pores are small, and closely spaced over the scale surface except under the anterior submarginal ribs and dome. Specialized apical scales are smaller, more circular, asymmetric, and with a forward-projecting spine. The craspedodont bristles, have an open slit running the length of the shaft, an expanded and flat foot, and a row of small teeth lining the apex of the shaft. Although the scale structure is distinctly different, some features of the scales and bristles are most closely related to the fossil species M. schumachii, another taxon with large scales described from the same fossil locality. Given the lack of a V-rib, M. gigantica may represent a stem taxon of section Planae, but similarities with species in the modern section Punctiferae lineage are also discussed. The large, robust and heavy nature of the scales may have posed disadvantageous to the cell by making a slow swimmer more prone to sinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".