MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403648081 · doi:10.25303/2811rjce037047

Assessment of Maximum Temperature for Future Time Series over Aurangabad, Maharashtra State, India

2024· article· en· W4403648081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yogesh Barokar

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal of Chemistry and Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)State (computer science)Time seriesMathematicsStatisticsGeographyAlgorithmGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climatic downscaling is an important tool used by many researchers in the field of climate to downscale climatic data available for global area to study the impacts of climate on smaller area. In climatic downscaling, there are mainly two types: 1) Statistical Downscaling and 2) Dynamical Downscaling. In the present study, statistical downscaling has been performed using SDSM (Statistical Downscaling Model) to find out future values of maximum temperatures (Tmax) over Aurangabad region (Latitude: 19.8911° N, Longitude: 75.1545° E). For this downscaling, CanESM2 (Canadian Earth System Model) CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) GCM (General Circulation Model) were selected and downscaling was performed under three different RCPs (Representative Concentration Pathways): RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. Downscaling model is calibrated and validated successfully over the baseline period 1961-2005 and results are presented graphically as well as statistically. Future downscaling values of maximum temperatures are presented with the help of three future time series: 2020s (2011-2040), 2050s (2041-2070) and 2080s (2071-2099) and it is observed that there is increase in the values of Tmax for the future time series with respect to the baseline period. Further the heat maps are developed for increasing monthly mean daily Tmax values under three RCPs with respect to the baseline period over the duration 2006 to 2013 and compared with increased observed monthly mean daily Tmax values over the same duration. This comparison has been done to assess the pattern of increasing monthly mean daily Tmax of downscaling results over Aurangabad region. All three RCPs are showing increasing values of monthly mean daily Tmax values for the selected three future time series with respect to the baseline period. Decade wise study of downscaling results is also showing increasing values of mean monthly daily Tmax with respect to the baseline period. Tmax values are predicted to be increased under RCP 2.6 by 1.10 0C, under RCP 4.5 by 2.13 0C and under RCP 8.5 by 4.20 0C at the end of 2099 which follows the prediction given by IPCC for global level temperature rise up to 2100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Journal of Chemistry and EnvironmentSame topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207