MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Infanticide

2024· reference-entry· en· W4403656144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2024
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infanticide, from the low Latin infanticidium, refers to the murder of a newborn, a crime found in all societies, in every historical period, and in most cases committed by its mother. The word infanticidium, first used by Tertullian in the Apologeticum (c. 197), denotes a ritual crime of a child in the context of early Christianity. The crime referred to the Holy Innocents—the children of Bethlehem massacred by Herod in the attempt to destroy the Infant Jesus (Matthew 2:16–18)—and/or was associated with the issue of baptism in newborn children. The word infanticide, however, was foreign to the Roman law; there is evidence of its employ in crescendo in Western sources (jurists’ treatises, criminal archives, forensic medicine, literature, encyclopedias, etc.) only since the late sixteenth century. In the early modern period, both Protestant and Catholic countries reinforced the control against child murders in all its aspects to prevent suffocation and pregnancy concealment; the Catholic Church was concerned about saving the souls of newborn children and desired for them to avoid the eternal conditions of Limbo. Infanticide is also perceived as an attempt at birth control and controlling the sex ratio, or as a failed abortion or abandonment. Infanticide was frequently affiliated or confused with abandonment, exposure, suffocation, accidental smothering, concealment, abortion, and homicide, as well as parricide, well into the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, while during the eighteenth century, infanticide appears more like a crime committed to save honor, and judges were generally indulgent with regard to criminal mothers. In the early twenty-first century, different disciplines that cross the histories of childhood, women, and gender studies—that is, anthropology, behavioral biology, criminology, law history, forensic medicine, demography, psychology, sociology, etc.—set out to give the reasons for this cruel act. Here we finally consider infanticide studies as an independent research subject within a historical perspective separated from the clinical and forensic literature, which developed from the middle of the nineteenth century. Historians dealing with infanticide were often discouraged by the “lack of sources” or by difficulty in identifying the cause of death because infanticide was easy to conceal. Forensic and juridical sources are more abundant starting in the eighteenth century, and from this century on, the crime is finally classified as infanticide. Infanticide in the field of historical sciences is a recent subject of study. There are still no exhaustive studies that bring together all-round works from a chronological and geographical point of view; nevertheless, in recent years these studies are increasing and very promising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it