MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403657727 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.202420193

Advanced Seismic Imaging Solutions for Nuclear Waste Repository Site Evaluation and Characterization

2024· article· en· W4403657727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Cosma, N. Enescu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioactive wasteCharacterization (materials science)Waste managementEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The accurate imaging of fractured hardrock environments is essential for critical applications such as nuclear waste disposal and deep mining exploration. Seismic hardrock imaging techniques have evolved significantly, with the development of advanced processing techniques and the integration of surface and borehole seismic data. The 3D Image Point (IP) transform and migration have played a key role in addressing the challenges of complex geological and structural settings. This technology has been successfully applied in nuclear waste disposal studies in Finland and Sweden and more recently, in the preliminary characterization of a potential Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s nuclear fuel waste disposal. The IP transform simplifies the interpretation of complex wavefields and enhances true reflectors while suppressing unwanted wave types and noise. The complete methodology for 3D IP migration involves applying the IP transform, filtering and stacking, and creating migrated image volumes. This approach has proven effective in imaging steeply-dipping reflectors and delineating fracture zones, as demonstrated by case studies from various geological contexts. Ongoing research focuses on integrating 3D IP with emerging technologies like Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and machine learning tools to further enhance the performance and capabilities of seismic imaging in hardrock environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207