Structural causal influence (SCI) captures the forces of social inequality in models of disease dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mathematical modeling has played a central role in understanding how infectious disease transmission manifests in populations. These models have demonstrated the importance of key community-level factors in structuring epidemic risk, and are now routinely used in public health for decision support. One barrier to their broader utility is that the existing canon does not often accommodate social inequalities as distinct formal drivers of variability in transmission dynamics. Given decades of evidence supporting the organizational effects of inequalities in structuring society more generally, and infectious disease risk more specifically, addressing this modeling gap is of critical importance. In this study, we build on previous efforts to integrate social forces into computational epidemiology by introducing a metric, the structural causal influence (SCI). The SCI uses causal analysis to provide a measure of the relative vulnerability of sub-communities within a susceptible population, shaped by differences in characteristics such as access to therapy, exposure to disease, and other determinants driven by social forces. We develop our metric in a simple case and apply it to a context of public health importance: Hepatitis C virus in a population of persons who inject drugs. In addition, we demonstrate the flexibility of the SCI using an agent-based model of an infectious disease. Our use of the SCI reveals that, under specific parameters in a multi-community model, the "less vulnerable" community may achieve a basic reproduction number below one, ensuring disease extinction. However, even minimal transmission between communities can increase this number, leading to sustained epidemics within both communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".