Unraveling the Oxygen Vacancy–Performance Relationship in Perovskite Oxides at Atomic Precision via Precise Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the fundamental effect of the oxygen vacancy atomic structure in perovskite oxides on catalytic properties remains challenging due to diverse facets, surface sites, defects, etc. in traditional powder catalysts and the inherent structural complexity. Through quantitative synthesis of tetrahedral (LaCoO 2.5 -T), pyramidal (LaCoO 2.5 -P), and octahedral (LaCoO 3 ) epitaxial thin films as model catalysts, we demonstrate the reactivity orders of active-site geometrical configurations in oxygen-deficient perovskites during the CO oxidation model reaction: CoO 4 tetrahedron > CoO 6 octahedron > CoO 5 pyramid. Ambient-pressure Co L-edge and O K-edge XAS spectra clarify the dynamic evolutions of active-site electronic structures during realistic catalytic processes and highlight the important roles of defect geometrical structures. In addition, in situ XAS and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectra and density functional theory calculations directly reveal the nature of high reactivity for CoO 4 sites and that the derived shallow-acceptor defect levels in the band structure facilitate the adsorption and activation of reactive gases, resulting in more than 23-fold enhancement for catalytic reaction rates than CoO 5 sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".