Construir la escuela, definir una lengua : posicionamientos en relación con la(s) lengua(s) de enseñanza en colonias de migrantes europeos en Argentina (1860-1870)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen : El presente artículo se ocupa de indagar en el problema de la selección de una(s) lengua( s) de enseñanza escolar en un espacio singularmente diverso: las colonias agrícolas formadas en la región rural de la provincia de Santa Fe (Argentina) desde mediados del siglo XIX, a partir del aporte inmigratorio europeo. Específicamente, se analizará el modo en que las primeras dos colonias establecidas en esa región, Esperanza y San Carlos, habitadas mayoritariamente por familias de habla francesa y alemana, discutieron el modo en que debía organizarse la institución escuela, fundamentalmente en relación con la(s) lengua(s) de enseñanza. Educar (o no) a los niños en un espacio cultural y lingüísticamente diverso constituyó una verdadera polémica caracterizada por posicionamientos encontrados. A partir del análisis discursivo de un corpus constituido por correspondencia y prensa periódica, se señalará cómo funcionarios y familias con diferentes trayectorias culturales, políticas y educativas asignaron distintas valoraciones a la escolaridad en general, y a la alfabetización en particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".