Idéologies patriotiques et linguistiques du glossairiste Oscar Dunn au XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oscar Dunn (1845-1885) est un des premiers intellectuels à affirmer la légitimité du français canadien. Ses idées à propos de l’identité nationale des Canadiens français permettent de mieux comprendre ses propos concernant la langue. Dunn considère par exemple que les canadianismes sont tout à fait légitimes du fait qu’ils permettent à ses compatriotes d’exprimer leur nationalité, différente de celle des Français. L’objectif de cet article est d’analyser en quoi les idées de Dunn à propos de la nation canadienne-française (son destin, son identité, son rapport à la France) se reflètent dans ses discours qui revendiquent l’autonomie linguistique des Canadiens français. Cette étude s’appuie sur une variété de documents, incluant ses oeuvres imprimées, ses discours publics et sa correspondance personnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".