Choroid Plexus Volume in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies suggest that the choroid plexus (CP) may function as a site of access of inflammatory cells into the CNS in multiple sclerosis (MS). Pediatric-onset MS (POMS) is characterized by a high inflammatory burden, as evidenced by a high relapse rate and volume of T2 lesions, making patients with POMS an informative population to evaluate choroid plexus volume (CPV). The objectives of the study were (1) to evaluate CPV at symptom onset in participants with POMS compared with healthy controls (HCs); (2) to evaluate changes in CPV in the first year of disease in participants with POMS; and (3) to evaluate associations between CPV, brain volumes, relapse activity, and disability in participants with POMS. METHODS: Baseline 1.5T MRI scans were acquired from 23 participants with POMS and 23 age-matched and sex-matched HCs; 18 participants with POMS also had 12-month follow-up MRI scans. The CP of the lateral ventricles was segmented manually. CP and brain structure volumes were normalized for total intracranial volume. The number of relapses, T2 and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesion counts, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores at 12 months were also analyzed. Baseline CPVs were compared between groups using the Wilcoxon exact test, and CPV change from baseline to 12 months in participants with POMS was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The relationship between CPV and brain volumetric measures, T2 lesion volumes, lesion count, number of relapses, and EDSS scores was assessed through Spearman correlation. RESULTS: = 0.012 for both groups) but did not correlate with brain and T2 lesion volumes or lesion count at baseline, nor with relapse activity or EDSS scores at 12 months in participants with POMS. DISCUSSION: CPV measured at baseline is greater in participants with POMS than in HCs. Baseline CPV did not predict higher disease activity or worse neurologic outcomes over 1 year. While higher CPV may be an early feature of inflammation in MS, its strong correlation with ventricular volumes could also reflect enlargement secondary to the mechanical attachment of CP to the ventricular wall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".