MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403674583 · doi:10.1109/ojemb.2024.3485535

Generation of Seismocardiography Heartbeats Using a Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network With Feature Control

2024· article· en· W4403674583 on OpenAlexafffund
James Skoric, Yannick D’Mello, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Generative adversarial networkAdversarial systemGenerative grammarComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Pattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Goal:</i> Seismocardiography (SCG) offers critical insights into cardiac performance, but its analysis often faces challenges due to the limited availability of data. This study aims to generate synthetic SCG heartbeats which can augment existing datasets to enable more research avenues. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods</i>: We trained a Wasserstein generative adversarial network (GAN) with gradient penalty on authentic SCG heartbeats. It was conditioned with embedded subject-specific identifiers to create individualized heartbeats. We employed linear permutations in the latent and conditional spaces to control signal features, and a convolutional network to classify lung volume states from real and synthetic data separately. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results</i>: The model effectively replicated SCG signal morphology, while maintaining a level of variance which matches the variability of cardiac activity. Comparisons with real SCG waveforms yielded Pearson's r-squared correlation of 0.62 for average heartbeats. Linear manipulations were successful in controlling simple features although they were limited in more complex characteristics. Additionally, the model demonstrated strong performance in practical applications, with the synthetic data achieving an accuracy of 88% in lung volume classification as compared to 89% achieved with real data. Augmenting real data with additional synthetic data improved performance by 3%. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions</i>: GANs for artificial SCG heartbeat generation produce realistic and diverse results that have the potential to overcome data limitations, thereby enhancing SCG-based research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and BiologySame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207