MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-Time Interactive Capabilities of Dual-Arm Systems for Humanoid Robots in Unstructured Environments

2024· article· en· W4403677151 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Jia, Yuan Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanoid robotDual (grammatical number)Computer scienceRobotHuman–computer interactionEmbedded systemSimulationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficient and rapid processing of target positions is crucial for the real-time interactive motion operations of humanoid robots within unstructured acquisition. This paper presents a novel strategy for the acquisition and transfer of target positions, optimizing the coordination of dual-arm systems in humanoid robots, essential for improving grasping speed and environment interaction responsiveness. The proposed approach integrates a camera mounted on the observer arm for real-time target detection, alongside an executor arm responsible for performing interactive tasks. The mechanism performs seamless and swift target acquisition of positions, converting them from the observer to the executor arm’s operational frame. We utilize YOLOv8 for instant target object detection in RGB images, coupled with depth image analysis for accurate object interaction. A calibration method, enhanced by a plus sign median filter (PSMF), is introduced to improve the accuracy and precision of the depth data. Additionally, a novel kinematic technique is proposed to expedite the position transfer process. Simulation and experimental validations show the efficiency of our kinematic approach, which is demonstrated to be nearly 50 times faster than traditional methods. Moreover, the PSMF calibration technique significantly elevates the robot’s grasping response and success rate, showing that the proposed methods augment the interactive capabilities of humanoid robots in dynamic settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207