Differentiating MYCN-amplified RB1 wild-type retinoblastoma from biallelic RB1 mutant retinoblastoma using MR-based radiomics: a retrospective multicenter case–control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MYCN -amplified RB1 wild-type ( MYCN amp RB1 +/+ ) retinoblastoma is a rare and aggressive subtype, often resistant to standard therapies. Identifying unique MRI features is crucial for diagnosing this subtype, as biopsy is not recommended. This study aimed to differentiate MYCN amp RB1 +/+ from the most prevalent RB1 -/- retinoblastoma using pretreatment MRI and radiomics. Ninety-eight unilateral retinoblastoma patients (19 MYCN cases and 79 matched controls) were included. Tumors on T2-weighted MR images were manually delineated and validated by experienced radiologists. Radiomics analysis extracted 120 features per tumor. Several combinations of feature selection methods, oversampling techniques and machine learning (ML) classifiers were evaluated in a repeated fivefold cross-validation machine learning pipeline to yield the best-performing prediction model for MYCN . The best model used univariate feature selection, data oversampling (duplicating MYCN cases), and logistic regression classifier, achieving a mean AUC of 0.78 (SD 0.12). SHAP analysis highlighted lower sphericity , higher flatness , and greater gray-level heterogeneity as predictive for MYCN amp RB1 +/+ status, yielding an AUC of 0.81 (SD 0.11). This study shows the potential of MRI-based radiomics to distinguish MYCN amp RB1 +/+ and RB1 -/- retinoblastoma subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".