MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403684352 · doi:10.1080/19761597.2024.2414906

Robots and the corporate immunity–Evidence from the impact of the epidemic in China

2024· article· en· W4403684352 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Liu, Yifei Yang, Taoxiong Liu, Haoran Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Technology Innovation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersHumanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of ChinaFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChinaImmunityBusinessPolitical scienceBiologyImmune systemImmunologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the influence of industrial robots on corporate immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic, utilising data from Chinese manufacturing listed companies between 2017Q1 and 2020Q1. The primary findings indicate that industrial robots can foster immunity to alleviate the adverse effects of the COVID-19 crisis, and this mitigation effect is substantial. The empirical results remain robust after conducting numerous tests and instrumental variable regression. The development of immunity by industrial robots occurs through two mechanisms: labour substitution and enhanced operational efficiency. The immunity effect of industrial robots is more pronounced in state-owned, high-tech firms, and companies severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Technology InnovationSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207