42 Clinical features and severity of COVID-19 with respiratory virus coinfections versus SARS-CoV-2 monoinfection in hospitalized children: A Canadian national surveillance study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2 alongside other respiratory viruses has led to the risk of coinfections, potentially intensifying the severity of cases, especially in children. Objectives This study examined the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus coinfections in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 monoinfections in hospitalized children. Design/Methods A nationwide surveillance study was conducted to assess paediatric COVID-19-related hospitalizations across Canada from April 2020 to May 2022. Data were captured through two datasets covering ~90% of all Canadian tertiary-care paediatric beds: The Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program and the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program, ACTive. Coinfections were defined as the simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and ≥1 other respiratory virus. Severe infection was defined as intensive care, ventilatory, or hemodynamic support needs, organ systems complications, or death. Variables and outcomes were summarized and compared, and risk ratios were computed using Poisson regression, adjusting for age, gender, comorbid conditions, SARS-CoV-2 lineage, and vaccination status. Results Out of 1501 COVID-19-related hospitalizations, 163 (10.9%) had documented coinfections with 44/163 [27%] involving SARS-COV-2 plus ≥2 other respiratory viruses. The majority of SARS-CoV-2 monoinfections (1176/1501, 87.9%) and coinfections (139/163, 85.3%) belonged to the Omicron era (Figure A). RSV (66/163, 40.5%) and Enterovirus/rhinovirus (61/163, 37.4%) coinfections were the most common. Coinfection cases were significantly younger than monoinfection cases (median age 1.2 [IQR:0.3-3.3] vs 1.6 [IQR:0.3-7.0] years, p=0.04). Overall, severe disease was more common among cases with any coinfection (38.0%) than SARS-CoV-2 monoinfection (25.7%; adjusted risk ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.80) (Figure B). In particular, we observed that severe outcomes were significantly higher in SARS-CoV-2 coinfections compared to monoinfections during the Omicron era (Figure C-D). Overall, 26/61 (42.6%) Enterovirus/Rhinovirus and 20/66 (30.3%) RSV coinfections were associated with severe outcomes. Conclusion Children with documented coinfections had more severe respiratory disease compared to SARS-COV-2 monoinfections. However, children with severe COVID-19 may have been more likely tested for multiple viruses, leading to a risk of underestimation of coinfections among children with milder disease. Further work is needed to assess how different virus coinfections may affect children and which, if any, may be a predominant driver of disease severity. 1Severe disease was defined as intensive care, ventilatory, or hemodynamic support requirements, organ system complications, or death. 2Lineage was first assigned based on available genetic sequencing data. If missing, lineage was imputed based on the dominant circulating lineage at the provincial level according to the GISAID database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".