Multitype Origin‐Destination (OD) Passenger Flow Prediction for Urban Rail Transit: A Deep Learning Clustering First Predicting Second Integrated Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately predicting origin‐destination (OD) passenger flows serves as the basis for implementing efficient plans, including line planning and timetabling. However, due to the complexity and variety of OD passenger flows types, general prediction models have difficulty in capturing the features of different OD passenger flows, which in turn leads to poor prediction performance. To address this issue, we propose an integrated framework that combines clustering and prediction methods. First, an unsupervised deep learning model is devised to automatically cluster OD flow types by capturing shape characteristics. Second, three types of features are created to enhance training efficiency, including static features, time‐dependent observed features, and time‐dependent known features. Based on the clustering of OD passenger flow, a weighted adaptive passenger flow prediction model is developed. The study employs a temporal fusion transformers model to enable multitype OD passenger flow prediction. In the numerical experiments, the model was applied to the urban rail transit in South China, and the model clustered 15,168 OD pairs into 4 types for prediction. The findings show that this approach enhanced the prediction accuracy by 2.0%–9.6% compared to the LSTM model and by 1.6%–4.3% compared to the Graph WaveNet. Moreover, the model can accurately assess the various features for diverse types of OD flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".